Sunday Observer Online


News Bar

News: Attempts to block aid, loans will not succeed ...           Finanacial News: Tourism Development Authority, a shot in the arm for industry ...          Sports: Two new records at School Games ...

DateLine Sunday, 30 September 2007





Marriage Proposals
Government Gazette

Body & soul - Compiled by Shanika Sriyananda
[email protected]


Osteoporosis and BMD

If you didn't have bones you would just be a shapeless blob on the floor. You might have learned about human skeleton from the popular song "that the ankle bone is connected to knee bone..." etc you might have been taught by your parents, teachers and doctors to drink milk to build strong bones and teeth.

You must have watched a lot of television advertisements (TV ads) and ads in newspapers and journals giving you all the beneficial effects of various brands of malted milk and (cow's) milk powder and how these various brands of malted milk and cow's milk containing varying amounts of calcium prevent osteoporosis.

Americans consume more cow's milk and its products than most populatations in the world. So Americans must have wonderful strong bones. Unfortunately this is not so. A recent study showed that American women aged 50 and older have one of the highest rates of hip fractures in the world.

The only countries with higher rates of hip fractures are in Europe and in South Pacific (Australia and New Zealand) where they consume even more milk than the U.S.

An excess rate of hip fractures often used as a reliable indicator of osteoporosis, a bone disease which especially affects women after menopause and this is claimed to be due to inadequate intake of calcium.

Dairy products are particularly rich in calcium, so that dairy industry eagerly supports efforts to boost calcium consumption. This is why you see so many TV ads about various brands of milk powder and malted milk. As mentioned earlier these countries that use the most cow's milk and its products also have the highest fracture rates and worst bone health.

One possible explanation is found in a report showing an impressively strong association between intake of animal protein and bone fracture rate for women in different countries.

Authored in 1993 by researchers at Yale University School of Medicine, the report summarized data on protein intake and fracture rates taken from 34 separate surveys in 16 countries that were published in 29 peer - reviewed publications. All the subjects in these surveys were women 50 years and older and it is noteworthy that 70 percent of the fracture rate was attributable to consumption of animal protein.

These researchers explained that animal protein unlike plant protein increased the acid load in the body. The body does not like this acidic environment and begins to fight it. In order to neutralize the acid, the body uses calcium which acts as a very effective base.

This calcium must come from somewhere and it ends up being pulled from bones and the calcium loss weakens the bone, putting them at greater risk for fracture.

There had been evidence for well over 100 years that animal protein decreases bone health. In 1880 it was first suggested that animal protein causes metabolic acid load and this was documented as long as 1920 and other studies showed that consumption of animal protein is more effective than plant protein at increasing metabolic acid load in the body.

When animal protein increases metabolic acid and draws calcium from bones, amount of calcium in urine is increased and average American intake of protein is 70-100g/day. The observation on the association between animal protein consumption and bone fracture rate is very impressive.

A study published in 2000, comes from the department of Medicine, at the University of California at St. Francisco. Using 87 surveys in 33 countries it compared the ratio vegetable to animal protein consumption to the rate of bone fracture. A high ratio of vegetable to animal protein consumption was found to be impressively associated with virtual disappearance of bone fractures.

The study of Osteoporotic Research Group at University of California at San Francisco, involving 1,000 women aged 65 and up shows that after 7 years of observation, the women with the highest ratio of animal protein to vegetable protein had 3.7 times more bone fractures than women with the lowest ratio.

In rural China study where animal protein to plant protein ratio was about 10 percent, the fracture rate is one fifth that of the U.S. In Nigeria, the animal to plant protein ratio is only about 10 percent that of Germany and the hip fracture rate is lower by over 99 percent.

Do widely advertised claims that protein-rich dairy products protect our bones? Everyday we watch TV ads showing advantages of taking certain brands of milk powder containing calcium to get strong bones and to prevent osteoporosis.

It would be very interesting for one of our orthopaedic surgeons or a rheumatologist to compare the incidence of hip fractures among rural post menopausal women (who consume less animal proteins than the urban women) with urban post menopausal women who consume more animal proteins and takes calcium tablets regularly.

Prof. Mark Hegsted (long time Harvard Professor) believes that excessive high intake of calcium consumed over a long time impairs the body's ability to control how much calcium it uses and when.

Under healthy conditions the body uses an activated form of vitamin D, "calcitirol" to adjust how much calcium it absorbs from food and how much it excretes and distributes in the bones. Calcitriol is considered a hormone. It seems perfectly plausible that animal protein and even calcium when consumed at excessive levels are capable of increasing the risk of osteoporosis.

But dairy industry still suggests that we should consume more of its products and spends hundreds of thousands of rupees to advertise their products with a view to built strong bones and teeth. Huge amounts of money are at stake as well.

One of the most cited osteoporosis experts, one funded by dairy industry angrily wrote in a prominent editorial, that the diet favouring a diet with higher ratio of plant-to-animal protein cited above could have been influenced to some extent by 'currents' in the larger society (The currents he was referring were animal rights activitists opposed to the use of dairy foods).

Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

BMD is a measure of bone density that is often used to diagnose bone health. If BMD falls below a certain level you may be at risk of osteoporosis i.e., if your BMD is low, you are at a risk for fracture.

Much better predictor of osteoporosis is dietary ratio of animal-to-plant protein the higher the ratio higher the risk of disease. BMD appears as it is associated with the ratio. Duke University researchers recently found an association between a high dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D and brain lesion volume in elderly men and women.

The researchers believe that the problem may be due to the effects of calcification and bone like formations in blood vessels Vit. D. enhances calcium absorption. Current dietary calcium and Vitamin D recommended for adult over 50 years of age are 1,200 mg and 400 to 600 i.u. respectively and recent findings suggest that these recommendations may be too high for general population.

The WHO acknowledges that less dietary calcium is needed when animal protein consumption is low.

Risk of osteoporosis

1) Stay physically active. Take the stairs instead of the lift; Brisk walking daily for about one hour or jogging, cycling or swimming or doing yoga are useful measurers.

2) Eat a variety of whole plants foods, avoid animal foods; calcium is available in plenty in plant foods such as "Niwithi", legumes such as beans and leafy vegetables. Stay away from refined carbohydrates like sugary cereals, candies, plain pastas and white breads.

3) Keep your salt intake to a minimum. Avoid highly processed and packaged foods which contain excess salt.

4) Don't be deceived by misleading TV ads about milk foods which the dairy industry claims to prevent osteoporosis.

Get the skin glow through microdermabrasion

It is not a chemical, not a laser, not surgery. Yet, it is one of the most sought after cosmetic procedures today with a huge celebrity following. So, what is this treatment that makes skin youthful and glowing? The answer might surprise you.

It is a painless non-surgical treatment called microdermabrasion step further with their "Skin Glow" treatment.

What is "skin glow"?

It is a combination of microdermabrasion, a non-invasive procedure that offers safe and controlled removal of outer dead layers of skin followed by a revitalising mask which provides intense hydration.

"Skin Glow" is an effective technique for reducing enlarged pores, smoothing acne scars and blemished skin and diminishing the fine lines and brown spots caused by aging. According to Ramani, improvements in their skin defects regardless of skin type and colour.

Microdermabrasion is not a new technology. It has been around since 1985 and is extremely safe. It uses sterile aluminum oxide micro - crystals and a hand held vacuuming device to remove the top layer of the skin.

Although this might sound agonising, the procedure is painless and feels about as abrasive as a lick from a cat's tongue, or better still, think exfoliating scrubs, only a bit stronger.

"The exfoliating procedure removes dead skin cells, revealing younger looks and healthier skin underneath. The results mean that fine lines, acne scarring and age spots being less, visible," explained Ramani.

What does it involve?

A visit to Ramani studio begins with a private consultation with Ramani who analyses and designs a customized skin care program to deliver maximum benefits. Expect questions on medical history and lifestyle issues. All pre-facial treatments done must be disclosed to ensure no side effects such as redness or swelling.

"Waxing, threading, electrolysis and facial bleach must be avoided a week before and after the treatment," said Ramani. Before commencing the treatment as an added precaution a crystal sensitivity test is carried out to rule out a rare case of sensitivity.

Next, the skin is properly cleansed with mild cleanser after which the microdermabrasion machine is used to remove dead, superficial skin cells. The treatment wand is placed on the skin and a fine flow of microscopic crystals is directed on to the surface of the skin.

The speed of the crystals, together with their abrasive nature, gently removes old, dead skin cells, layer by layer. Specific attention is given to any areas of concern such as open pores, wrinkles, blemished skin and acne-scarring. Exfoliation takes about half an hour and it is not painful at all, although it does feel like someone is sandblasting the face and vacuuming it.

Following this, a facial mask is applied which feels extremely soothing and cool. The mask is aimed at moisturizing and hydrating the skin. The results are immediate and even after the first treatment; the skin feels smooth, fresh and visibly radiant.

"However we do instruct people to avoid direct sun exposure for seven days after treatment and to use a sunscreen before stepping outdoors," she cautioned.

Although side effects are very rare, it is advisable to undergo "Skin Glow", two to three days prior to any special occasion to avoid any unpleasant surprises. If you want your skin to look fresh and radiant "Skin Glow" is yours to explore.


Gamin Gamata - Presidential Community & Welfare Service

| News | Editorial | Financial | Features | Political | Security | Spectrum | Impact | Sports | World | Magazine | Junior | Letters | Obituaries |


Produced by Lake House Copyright 2007 The Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Ltd.

Comments and suggestions to : Web Editor